Has nobody ever tried to teach you anything? I tried to give you some information regarding the point of the part you've just spent money on. You're reviewing a component you don't understand and giving out incorrect information to people that might want to actually learn about the parts they're fitting to their cars.
"Planted may not be the correct technical term of what can be felt but in truth some people buying this part will also have limited knowledge as myself." That's exactly my point. Example: Somebody wants more front end grip (highly likely in a fwd car). They go in search of ways to achieve this: a stiffer rear arb is a relatively cheap upgrade and a sensible starting point. They then search for DC5 arb's and stumble across a review that you were kind enough to take the effort to create. In this review, the only piece of information regarding the handling/balance aspect of the item is incorrect. This may seem like a long winded way of explaining myself, but your initial brush off of "oh it doesn't matter if it's not correct, I've got limited knowledge and so do some other people" makes me think you didn't understand what I was trying to say in the first place.
"As soon as you start adjusting the rigidity of the link weakens in the middle giving the flex" << This also doesn't make sense. The idea of adjustable links, as far as fitment goes, it to change the orientation of the bar. ie, moving the arms/short bits of the bar up or down. They have other uses, but they're not relevant in this application.
I'm tired and grumpy and could probably be more diplomatic in my approach, but it is what it is. Feel free to sugar coat it however you want, but my point still stand.
